![]() |
Trail of TearsWeb Quest |
![]() |
Introduction |
Task |
Resources | Worksheets |
Evaluations | The Quest | The Paper |




While searching for clues it will be important to take notes you may work in pairs or alone for note taking and evidence discovery. We will spend most of a week seeking out the important facts that will be used to write a history. Check the website resources as more sites may be added.
Your paper needs to be 3-5 pages long and you should use the format for papers that you have been given. Your paper should have an introductory paragraph, paragraphs that support your main idea or focus, and a conclusion. You may focus on one or several aspects of this historical event. You can use the Rubric as a guide to what will be a good paper. If you quote a source you should cite the source. For information on how to cite sources go to how to cite, use the MLA style for citing sources.
| Criteria | Excellent | Well Done | Satisfactory | Needs Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| On Task Behavior | Didn't have to be reminded to stay on task by teacher | Had to be reminded only once to remain on task | Had to be reminded 2 times to remain on task and behave appropriately | Had to be reminded several times to remain on task and behave appropriately |
| Internet Use | Successfully uses suggested internet links to find information and navigates within these sites easily without assistance. | Usually able to use suggested internet links to find information and navigates within these sites easily without assistance. | Occasionally able to use suggested internet links to find information and navigates within these sites easily without assistance. | Needs assistance or supervision to use suggested internet links and/or to navigate within these sites. |
| Identifies Important Information | Student lists all the main points of the article without having the article in front of him/her. | The student lists all the main points, but uses the article for reference. | The student lists all but one of the main points, using the article for reference. S/he does not note any unimportant points. | The student cannot important information with accuracy. |
| Notes | Notes are recorded legibly and are somewhat organized. | Notes are recorded. | Notes are recorded only with peer/teacher assistance and reminders. | No notes are recorded. |
| Criteria | Excellent | Well Done | Satisfactory | Needs Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Draft | Detail draft is neatly presented and includes pertinent information | Draft includes pertinent information and is legible | Draft includes some pertinent information and is legible | Draft has little information and is difficult to read |
| Final Draft | ||||
| Paragraph construction | All paragraphs include introductory sentence, explanations or details, and concluding sentence. | Majority of paragraphs include introductory sentence, explanations or details, and concluding sentence. | Paragraphs include related information, but were not well constructed. | Paragraph structucre was not clear and sentences were not typically related within the paragraphs. |
| Mechanics (Grammer/Spelling) | No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. | Almost no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. | More than 3 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. | More than 10 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. |
| Organization | The paper has a clear introduction with a thesis statement, supporting paragraphs, and clear conclusion. | The paper has an introduction, supporting paragraphs, and a conclusion. | The paper is in paragraph form, but it is not clearly introduced, supported, or concluded. | The paper is confusing to read and the reader has a difficult time following the authors train of thought. | Quality of Information | Information clearly realtes to the author's main topic. (Should refelect the theme of the Webquest.) It includes several supporting details and/or examples. | Information clearly realtes to the author's main topic. (Should refelect the theme of the Webquest.) It includes only 1 or 2 supporting details and/or examples. | Information clearly realtes to the author's main topic. (Should refelect the theme of the Webquest.) No details and/or examples are given | Information has little or nothing to do with the theme of the Webquest |